Cost and Management Accounting · Overheads - Absorption Costing Method
Secondary Distribution: Reapportionment of Service Costs
Updated 4 October 2026 · Fact-checked
Secondary distribution moves the cost of service departments, such as stores or maintenance, to the production departments that use them. You do it by the direct, step or repeated distribution method, or by simultaneous equations when departments serve each other. Use the given percentages, check the total equals primary overheads, then absorb.
Understand Secondary Distribution: Reapportionment of Service Costs
After primary distribution, every department has its own overhead total. Production departments make the product. Service departments (stores, maintenance, canteen, power house) do not. Their costs cannot be charged to products directly, so you must push them into the production departments. This step is secondary distribution, also called reapportionment.
The basis is the benefit each department receives. Stores cost may follow number of requisitions, maintenance may follow machine hours, canteen may follow number of employees. In exam questions the basis is usually given as percentages.
The four methods differ in how they treat services between service departments:
- Direct method: ignores services between service departments. Each service cost goes only to production departments.
- Step (non-reciprocal) method: recognises that a service department serves other service departments, but only one way. You close one department at a time and never go back.
- Repeated distribution method: used when service departments serve each other both ways (reciprocal services). You keep redistributing until the leftover is negligible.
- Simultaneous equation method: also for reciprocal services. You write an equation for the total cost of each service department and solve it. This gives the exact figure at once.
The golden check: total overhead of production departments after secondary distribution must equal total primary overhead of all departments. If it does not, you have made an error. The final figures are then used to compute overhead absorption rates.
Key rules to remember
- Reapportioned share
- Share to a department = Service cost to be distributed × (its percentage or ratio ÷ total of the ratios used)
- In the direct method the ratios used are only those of production departments, so re-base the percentages to 100.
- Step method order
- Close first the department that serves the most departments or has the largest cost
- Follow the order given in the question if it is stated. Once closed, a department gets no further cost.
- Simultaneous equation for reciprocal services
- S1 = own primary cost of S1 + (% of S2 service to S1) × S2 and S2 = own primary cost of S2 + (% of S1 service to S2) × S1
- S1 and S2 are the total costs of the service departments after receiving each other's share. Solve, then distribute these totals.
- Closing check
- Σ (production department overheads after secondary distribution) = Σ (all primary overheads)
- Always verify this before moving to absorption rates.
How to solve Secondary Distribution: Reapportionment of Service Costs questions
This method works for any secondary distribution question, whatever the method asked.
- 1List primary totals of all production and service departments. Add them to get the control total.
- 2Read the question for the method required. If none is named and services are reciprocal, use simultaneous equations or repeated distribution. If one-way, use step or direct.
- 3Write the percentage matrix: for each service department, its percentage of service to every other department. Each row must add to 100.
- 4Direct method: re-base percentages to production departments only and distribute. Step method: close departments one by one in the right order and carry received cost forward.
- 5Reciprocal services: either set up equations for the total of each service department and solve, or redistribute repeatedly until the balance is negligible.
- 6Distribute the final total of each service department to production departments using the percentages. Do not give back to a department already cleared in the step method.
- 7Add to primary totals to get final production department overheads. Check they equal the control total.
- 8If asked, compute overhead absorption rates using the final figures.
Quickest way: Matrix, equations, then check the total
When to use it: Use in the exam when you have reciprocal services or more than two service departments, and time is short.
- For MCQs, first check the control total. An option whose production total does not equal total primary overhead is wrong. This eliminates options fast.
- For MCQs on the direct method, just re-base percentages to production departments. No need to touch service-to-service percentages.
- For reciprocal services with two service departments, go straight to simultaneous equations. They are faster and more exact than repeated distribution.
- Written answer format: show the equations, the solved values, then a distribution table with departments in columns and each line as a step. Step marks go for the equations, the table and the final totals.
- Write the closing check at the bottom of the table. Examiners look for it.
- Keep working in whole rupees where possible. If decimals appear, carry them through and round only in the final answer.
Common mistakes in Secondary Distribution: Reapportionment of Service Costs
Using the original percentages in the direct method without re-basing to 100.
The table shows service to other service departments, and students forget these are ignored in the direct method.
Fix: Add only the production department percentages and divide each by that sum. For example 50 and 30 become 5/8 and 3/8.
Passing cost back to a department already closed in the step method.
Students treat the question as reciprocal when it is meant to be one-way.
Fix: Once a department is closed, ignore its percentage in later steps. Re-base the remaining percentages among departments still open.
Closing the service departments in the wrong order in the step method.
Students do not check which department serves most others.
Fix: Follow the order stated. If not stated, start with the one serving the most departments, or with the highest cost.
Forgetting to include the received cost when writing the equations in the simultaneous method.
Students write S1 = primary cost of S1 only, or use the wrong percentage.
Fix: Each equation is own primary cost plus the share received from the other service department. Check each percentage points in the right direction.
Stopping repeated distribution too early, leaving a large balance.
Students stop after one or two rounds to save time.
Fix: Continue until the balance is very small, then give the remainder to production departments. Or switch to simultaneous equations.
Not doing the closing total check.
Students rush to the absorption rate.
Fix: Add final production overheads and compare with the control total. A mismatch means a slip in the table.
Worked examples
Example 1
A company has production departments P1 and P2 and service departments S1 (Stores) and S2 (Maintenance). Primary overheads: P1 ₹3,00,000; P2 ₹2,00,000; S1 ₹60,000; S2 ₹40,000. S1 serves S2 20%, P1 50%, P2 30%. S2 serves P1 40% and P2 60%. Distribute service costs by (a) the direct method and (b) the step method, closing S1 first.
Show the solution
- Control total = 3,00,000 + 2,00,000 + 60,000 + 40,000 = ₹6,00,000.
- (a) Direct method. S1 ignores S2, so ratio P1 : P2 = 50 : 30 = 5 : 3. P1 gets 60,000 × 5/8 = ₹37,500. P2 gets 60,000 × 3/8 = ₹22,500.
- S2 serves only P1 and P2 in ratio 40 : 60. P1 gets 40,000 × 40% = ₹16,000. P2 gets ₹24,000.
- Direct totals: P1 = 3,00,000 + 37,500 + 16,000 = ₹3,53,500. P2 = 2,00,000 + 22,500 + 24,000 = ₹2,46,500. Sum = ₹6,00,000, which agrees with the control total.
- (b) Step method. Close S1: S2 gets 60,000 × 20% = ₹12,000. P1 gets 60,000 × 50% = ₹30,000. P2 gets 60,000 × 30% = ₹18,000.
- S2 now has 40,000 + 12,000 = ₹52,000. Close S2: P1 gets 52,000 × 40% = ₹20,800. P2 gets 52,000 × 60% = ₹31,200.
- Step totals: P1 = 3,00,000 + 30,000 + 20,800 = ₹3,50,800. P2 = 2,00,000 + 18,000 + 31,200 = ₹2,49,200. Sum = ₹6,00,000, which agrees with the control total.
Answer: Direct method: P1 ₹3,53,500 and P2 ₹2,46,500. Step method: P1 ₹3,50,800 and P2 ₹2,49,200. Both totals equal ₹6,00,000.
Example 2
Primary overheads: P1 ₹3,00,000; P2 ₹2,00,000; S1 ₹80,000; S2 ₹20,000. S1 serves S2 20%, P1 50%, P2 30%. S2 serves S1 50%, P1 30%, P2 20%. Reapportion service costs using the simultaneous equation method and find the final overheads of P1 and P2.
Show the solution
- Control total = 3,00,000 + 2,00,000 + 80,000 + 20,000 = ₹6,00,000.
- Let S1 and S2 be the total costs of the service departments. S1 = 80,000 + 0.5 S2 and S2 = 20,000 + 0.2 S1.
- Substitute: S1 = 80,000 + 0.5 (20,000 + 0.2 S1) = 80,000 + 10,000 + 0.1 S1.
- So 0.9 S1 = 90,000, giving S1 = ₹1,00,000.
- Then S2 = 20,000 + 0.2 × 1,00,000 = ₹40,000.
- Distribute S1 ₹1,00,000: S2 ₹20,000; P1 ₹50,000; P2 ₹30,000.
- Distribute S2 ₹40,000: S1 ₹20,000; P1 ₹12,000; P2 ₹8,000.
- Check: S1 received 20,000 from S2, so 80,000 + 20,000 = 1,00,000. S2 received 20,000 from S1, so 20,000 + 20,000 = 40,000. Both agree.
- P1 = 3,00,000 + 50,000 + 12,000 = ₹3,62,000. P2 = 2,00,000 + 30,000 + 8,000 = ₹2,38,000.
- Sum = ₹6,00,000, which agrees with the control total.
Answer: S1 = ₹1,00,000 and S2 = ₹40,000. Final overheads: P1 ₹3,62,000 and P2 ₹2,38,000.
Exam tips
- Read which method the question asks for. The same data gives different answers under direct, step and reciprocal methods, and each answer is valid only for its own method.
- If the question says services are reciprocal and names no method, simultaneous equations earn full marks and save time. Repeated distribution gives the same result if carried far enough.
- In MCQs, test options with the control total first. It removes wrong options in seconds.
- Present a clear table with each service department as a row. Show the equations separately so the examiner can give step marks even if one number slips.
- Expect the question to continue to overhead absorption rates or under/over absorption. Carry the final figures forward carefully.
Practice questions from Overheads - Absorption Costing Method
- Surya Engineering has two production departments, P and Q, and two service departments, S1 and S2. Primary-distributed overheads are: P ₹2,4…
- A factory's machine shop budgeted overheads of Rs 4,80,000 for the year and 24,000 machine hours. Actual overheads were Rs 5,10,000 and actu…
- Gupta Engineering absorbs factory overheads at ₹12 per direct labour hour. Budgeted overheads were ₹6,00,000 for 50,000 direct labour hours.…
- A firm's budgeted factory overhead is ₹9,00,000 and budgeted machine hours are 30,000. During the year, actual overhead was ₹9,60,000 and ac…
- Sharma Components Ltd. budgeted factory overheads of Rs 6,00,000 for the year and 40,000 machine hours. Actual factory overheads were Rs 6,3…
Secondary Distribution: Reapportionment of Service Costs: frequently asked questions
What is the difference between primary and secondary distribution of overheads?
Primary distribution spreads factory overheads over all departments, production and service. Secondary distribution then moves the service department costs to the production departments. After it, only production departments hold overheads.
When should I use the step method instead of the direct method?
Use the step method when the question says to recognise services between service departments, but those services run one way. Use the direct method when the question says to ignore inter-service-department services, or does not give them.
Repeated distribution or simultaneous equations: which is better?
Both handle reciprocal services. Simultaneous equations are quicker and give exact values. Repeated distribution is longer, but is useful when you are asked specifically for it. Use the method the question names.
Do reciprocal services change total overhead?
No. They change only how the total is split between production departments. The sum of production overheads after secondary distribution must equal the sum of all primary overheads.