FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Hypothesis Testing
A 95% confidence interval for a regression-estimated mean return is computed as 2.1% to 5.9%. Which statement is the correct interpretation under the frequentist approach used in the FRM curriculum?
About 95% of intervals constructed this way from repeated samples would contain the true mean. The parameter is fixed and the interval varies by sample, so the 95% is not a probability statement about this specific interval or about individual observations.
- AThere is a 95% probability that the true mean lies between 2.1% and 5.9% for this particular sample
- BApproximately 95% of such intervals built from repeated samples would contain the true meanCorrect
- C95% of individual observations lie between 2.1% and 5.9%
- DThe sample mean has a 95% chance of lying between 2.1% and 5.9%
Explanation
The true mean is a fixed number; the interval is random across samples. The 95% refers to the long-run proportion of intervals that capture the true mean. Option 1 treats the parameter as random, and the interval is not about individual observations or about the sample mean, which is the interval's center (4.0%).
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Hypothesis Testing shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Hypothesis Testing questions
- A researcher tests H0: mean return ≤ 0 versus H1: mean return > 0 using 36 observations, sample mean 0.9% and sample standard deviation 3.6%…
- In a simple regression of a portfolio's excess returns on market excess returns using 62 observations, the estimated beta is 1.15 with a sta…
- Two trading desks have daily return samples. Desk A: n = 16, sample variance 9.0. Desk B: n = 21, sample variance 4.0. Testing H0: variances…
- An analyst runs a two-tailed test of a population mean and obtains a p-value of 0.036. Which conclusion is correct?
- Which sequence correctly lists the steps of the standard hypothesis testing procedure?
- A risk manager backtests a 95% VaR model over 500 days. The model produced 35 exceptions. Using a two-tailed z-test at the 5% significance l…