Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Risk Mitigation

A bank outsources its loan-servicing platform to a vendor that itself relies on a single cloud provider. The bank's risk committee wants to mitigate the resulting concentration and fourth-party risk. Which action is most effective in addressing the specific weakness?

The most effective action is to require subcontractor disclosure, tested failover to an alternate provider, and exit and step-in provisions. These directly address fourth-party concentration and continuity, whereas indemnities, extra capital or a one-time report only cover financial loss or provide point-in-time assurance.

  1. ARely on the vendor's contractual indemnity for any losses
  2. BRequire the vendor to disclose subcontractors, test failover to an alternate provider, and include exit and step-in provisions in the contractCorrect
  3. CIncrease the bank's operational risk capital buffer only
  4. DObtain a one-time SOC report at contract signing

Explanation

The weakness is dependence on a single hidden subcontractor. Transparency on fourth parties, tested failover and exit or step-in rights address the concentration directly and preserve resilience. Indemnity and capital address only financial loss, and a one-time report does not provide ongoing assurance.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Risk Mitigation shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Risk Mitigation questions