Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Risk Mitigation

A bank tests its continuity plan for a critical clearing function. The plan relies on a nearby secondary site and on the same regional power grid and telecom provider as the primary site. A regional flood disables both. Which weakness in the plan design does this most directly illustrate, and what is the best remedy?

The failure shows concentration of common dependencies: both sites shared the same region, power and telecom. The best remedy is placing the recovery site in a separate risk region with independent utilities and testing failover against wide-area scenarios, rather than only tightening backup frequency.

  1. AInsufficient RPO; shorten backup intervals
  2. BConcentration of common dependencies; locate the recovery site in a separate risk region with independent utilities and test failover under a wide-area scenarioCorrect
  3. CExcessive staff training; reduce the number of exercises
  4. DPoor model validation; recalibrate the scenarios

Explanation

Both sites shared geography and infrastructure, so one event caused simultaneous failure. The remedy is geographic and utility diversification, validated by scenario tests that assume wide-area disruption. Shortening the RPO addresses data loss, not site availability.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Risk Mitigation shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Risk Mitigation questions