Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Risk Mitigation

A bank wants its annual continuity testing to provide the strongest evidence that critical staff and systems can actually perform under a severe but plausible disruption. Which approach is most appropriate?

A full failover exercise using a realistic severe scenario, the real recovery site, key third parties and unannounced elements, with findings followed through to remediation, gives the strongest evidence of capability. Document reviews, walkthroughs and call-tree checks test only limited aspects of the plan.

  1. AA desk-based review of the plan document by its authors
  2. BA walkthrough where team leaders discuss the plan in a meeting room
  3. CA full failover exercise with a realistic scenario, involving the actual recovery site, third parties and unannounced elements, with findings tracked to remediationCorrect
  4. DA call-tree test confirming that phone numbers are current

Explanation

Live full-failover tests with realistic, partly unannounced scenarios and third-party participation give the strongest assurance of real capability. Document reviews, walkthroughs and call-tree checks are lower-intensity tests and verify only parts of the plan.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Risk Mitigation shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Risk Mitigation questions