Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Risk Mitigation

A bank's business impact analysis shows that a trade settlement process generates losses that grow the longer it is down. The firm sets a maximum tolerable period of disruption (MTPD) of 8 hours. The supporting application has a recovery time objective (RTO) of 3 hours and a work recovery time (time to reconcile backlog and verify data after systems return) of 4 hours. Which conclusion is most appropriate?

The plan is consistent. The RTO of 3 hours plus the work recovery time of 4 hours equals 7 hours, which is within the 8-hour maximum tolerable period of disruption. Looking at the RTO alone would overlook the backlog reconciliation needed before the process is truly restored.

  1. AThe plan is consistent, because RTO of 3 hours is below the MTPD of 8 hours
  2. BThe plan is inconsistent, because RTO must equal the MTPD
  3. CThe plan is consistent, because RTO plus work recovery time is 7 hours, within the MTPD of 8 hoursCorrect
  4. DThe plan is inconsistent, because RTO plus work recovery time of 7 hours exceeds the MTPD

Explanation

The MTPD must cover both the technical recovery (RTO) and the work recovery time: 3 + 4 = 7 hours, which is less than 8 hours, leaving 1 hour of slack. Option A ignores work recovery time. RTO need not equal the MTPD; it should be shorter. Option D misstates 7 as exceeding 8.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Risk Mitigation shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Risk Mitigation questions