CS Executive · Jurisprudence, Interpretation and General Laws · Law relating to Information Technology
A cloud service provider, under a lawful contract, accesses a customer's personal information. Intending to cause wrongful loss, it discloses that material to a third party without the customer's consent. Under Section 72A as currently worded, what is the consequence?
The provider is liable to a penalty that may extend to twenty-five lakh rupees. Section 72A covers any person, including an intermediary, who discloses personal information accessed under a lawful contract without consent, with intent or knowledge of causing wrongful loss or gain. Actual gain is not required.
- AImprisonment of seven years with fine, as the offence is cognizable
- BThe provider is liable to a penalty which may extend to twenty-five lakh rupeesCorrect
- CNo liability, because only individuals and not intermediaries are covered
- DLiability only if the third party actually gains wrongfully
Explanation
Section 72A covers any person including an intermediary who, while providing services under a lawful contract, accesses personal information and discloses it without consent or in breach of contract, with intent to cause or knowing likely to cause wrongful loss or gain. Since the 2023 amendment, the consequence is liability to penalty up to twenty-five lakh rupees. The seven-year term belongs to Sections 69 and 69A, not 72A, and actual gain is not required.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Law relating to Information Technology shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Law relating to Information Technology questions
- Which of the following is a function that Section 70B(4) of the IT Act, 2000 assigns to the Indian Computer Emergency Response Team as the n…
- Meera and a company agreed, before an adjudicating officer under the IT Act, 2000, to the officer deciding a compensation claim, and the off…
- Mehta Exports Ltd programmes its order-processing system to automatically send purchase confirmations to suppliers. Due to a configuration e…
- An intermediary refuses to comply with a valid blocking direction issued under Section 69A(1) of the IT Act, 2000. What is the consequence p…
- Under the Information Technology Act, 2000, a subscriber publishes his Digital Signature Certificate in a repository. What is the legal effe…
- Ravi Textiles' statute requires a document to be 'signed'. Under Section 5 of the IT Act, 2000, when is this requirement deemed satisfied by…