CS Executive · Jurisprudence, Interpretation and General Laws · Law relating to Information Technology
A company's law requires its records to be kept for eight years. The company stores them in electronic form. Which of the following conditions is NOT required by the Information Technology Act, 2000 for this to satisfy the retention requirement?
A printed paper copy is not required. Under Section 7, electronic retention suffices if the information stays accessible, is kept in its original or an accurately representative format, and carries details of origin, destination, date and time of despatch or receipt.
- AThe information remains accessible so as to be usable for subsequent reference
- BThe record is retained in its original format or one that accurately represents the original information
- CDetails identifying origin, destination, date and time of despatch or receipt are available in the record
- DThe electronic record must also be retained in a printed paper copyCorrect
Explanation
Section 7(1) lists three conditions: accessibility for subsequent reference, retention in original or accurately representative format, and availability of origin, destination, date and time details. A parallel paper copy is not among them, so the fourth option is the one that is not required.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Law relating to Information Technology shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Law relating to Information Technology questions
- By accepting a Digital Signature Certificate, what does the subscriber certify to all who reasonably rely on the information in it, under Se…
- The Controller recognised a foreign Certifying Authority under section 19(1). Later, the Controller finds that it contravened the conditions…
- CERT-In calls for information from a data centre in connection with a cyber security incident, and the data centre fails to supply it. Which…
- Sunil files an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal under the IT Act, 2000 on the 60th day after receiving the order, explaining that he was…
- Meghna Traders, a proprietorship firm in Pune, stores customers' sensitive personal data on its own server. Because it was negligent in main…
- Ravi Traders is aggrieved by an order of an adjudicating officer under the IT Act, 2000. It receives a copy of the order on 1 March. Within …