ACCA Applied Knowledge · Management Accounting · Cost reductions and value enhancement
A company is value engineering a product. Current unit cost is $80 and the target cost for a required margin is $68. Redesign of components is expected to save $7 per unit and a change of supplier a further $3.50 per unit. What is the position after these actions?
Savings total $10.50, reducing unit cost from $80 to $69.50. That is still above the $68 target, so a cost gap of $1.50 per unit remains and further reductions are needed.
- ATarget cost is met with $2.50 per unit to spareCorrect
- BTarget cost is met exactly
- CA cost gap of $1.50 per unit remains
- DA cost gap of $5.00 per unit remains
Explanation
Total savings are 7 + 3.50 = $10.50, giving a new cost of 80 - 10.50 = $69.50. Target is $68, so a gap of $1.50 remains. Option 'met with spare' wrongly adds savings to the target instead of deducting from the cost.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Cost reductions and value enhancement shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Cost reductions and value enhancement questions
- Budgeted output was 10,000 units with a standard labour cost of $12 per unit. Actual output was 11,000 units and actual labour cost was $135…
- Which of the following is an example of cost reduction rather than cost control?
- Which of the following is the most accurate description of value engineering as used in value enhancement?
- Which of the following best describes the 'use value' of a product component in a value analysis exercise?
- A manufacturer reviews an existing product that has been in production for several years, examining each component and function to remove un…
- Which of the following is a risk of pursuing cost reduction through a lower-quality material?