CS Executive · Setting Up of Business, Industrial and Labour Laws · The Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act
A district court fines a Pune workshop owner for employing a child in contravention of the Act, and the fine is credited to the district Rehabilitation Fund. How much must the appropriate Government additionally credit to the Fund for that child?
The appropriate Government must credit fifteen thousand rupees to the Fund for each child or adolescent for whom the employer's fine has been credited. This is separate from the fine itself; twenty thousand and fifty thousand are the fine limits, not this government contribution.
- ARupees ten thousand
- BRupees fifteen thousandCorrect
- CRupees twenty thousand
- DRupees fifty thousand
Explanation
Section 14B(2) says the appropriate Government shall credit fifteen thousand rupees for each child or adolescent for whom the fine amount has been credited. Twenty thousand is the minimum fine, and fifty thousand is the maximum fine, so they are not this amount.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on The Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More The Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act questions
- Under the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, the appropriate Government must constitute the Child and Adole…
- Under the definitions in the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, who is the 'appropriate Government' for a m…
- A production house wishes to cast 10-year-old Aarav as an actor in a television serial. Which statement is correct under Section 3 of the Ac…
- Mehta Garments, a Surat firm, employs a child in contravention of section 3 of the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) …
- A ministry notifies that certain non-hazardous work may be done by adolescents. Which statement correctly reflects the Act's provision on th…
- A parent, Sunita, was earlier convicted for permitting her child to work in contravention of section 3. She commits a like offence again. Wh…