IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Economic Modelling · Measures of investment risk
A manager reduces tracking error by moving the portfolio closer to the benchmark weights. Which statement is most accurate?
Expected active return typically falls, because narrowing the gap to the benchmark reduces both relative risk and the room for outperformance. Absolute risk remains largely that of the benchmark, and the information ratio need not improve.
- ATotal portfolio volatility must fall below that of the benchmark
- BAbsolute risk is eliminated
- CThe portfolio's beta must become zero
- DExpected active return typically falls as the portfolio's scope for outperformance narrowsCorrect
- The information ratio must rise
Explanation
Moving closer to the benchmark cuts relative risk but also limits the active positions that generate outperformance. Total risk stays tied to the market's risk, so it does not vanish or fall below benchmark necessarily. The information ratio can go either way.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Measures of investment risk shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Measures of investment risk questions
- A portfolio's one-year loss has the following discrete distribution (Rs crore): loss 0 with probability 0.90, loss 10 with probability 0.06,…
- Over 5 years a portfolio's annual active returns relative to its benchmark were: +2%, -1%, +3%, 0% and +1%. Using the sample standard deviat…
- An investor has a utility of wealth function U(w) = ln(w). Which statement about this investor's attitude to risk is correct?
- A loss L has a discrete distribution: ₹0 with probability 0.90, ₹10 lakh with probability 0.06, ₹30 lakh with probability 0.03 and ₹100 lakh…
- Which statement about Value at Risk (VaR) at the 95% level over one year is correct?
- Annual returns on a portfolio are 10%, 20%, -10% and 0%, each equally likely. The target return is 5%. What is the downside semi-variance ab…