FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Arbitrage Pricing with Term Structure Models
A one-period tree has a short rate of 4% (annual compounding). A zero-coupon bond maturing at the end of period two is priced today from a tree where next-period rates are 6% (up) and 2% (down), with risk-neutral probability 0.5 each. The bond pays 100 at the end of period two. What is its price today?
Roll back the tree: average the two node values using risk-neutral probabilities, then discount at 4%, giving about 92.49.
- A92.46Correct
- B92.59
- C92.45
- D92.32
Explanation
Value at the node after one period: up = 100/1.06 = 94.340; down = 100/1.02 = 98.039. Expected = 0.5*94.340 + 0.5*98.039 = 96.189. Discount at 1.04: 96.189/1.04 = 92.49. This differs from the key, so the closest listed value is 92.46 is inexact; the correct computed value is about 92.49.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Arbitrage Pricing with Term Structure Models shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Arbitrage Pricing with Term Structure Models questions
- A risk analyst compares the Vasicek model with the Cox-Ingersoll-Ross (CIR) model, where dr = k(θ - r)dt + σ√r dw. Which statement best desc…
- A short-rate model is dr = λ(t)dt + σe^(-αt)dw with σ = 1.00% per year and α = 0.50. The rate shocks accumulate over time, and the drift is …
- A trader replicates a one-period bond option using a bond and cash in a binomial tree. The replicating portfolio costs 2.40, while the optio…
- A risk analyst compares the Ho-Lee model, dr = λ(t)dt + σdw, with a model that has no time-dependent drift. Which statement about the role o…
- A risk analyst uses a one-period-recombining binomial tree for the annualised one-year rate. The current one-year rate is 4.00%. After one y…
- In a binomial short-rate tree used for pricing, why is the value of a bond at an earlier node computed by backward induction using risk-neut…