CS Executive · Setting Up of Business, Industrial and Labour Laws · The Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act
A parent permits their child to work in a small unit in contravention of section 3 and it is the parent's first offence. Which statement is correct under section 14?
The parent is not liable for punishment for a first offence. Section 14(1B) exempts parents or guardians of a child or adolescent from punishment on the first offence; only a repeat offence after conviction attracts a fine up to Rs 10,000.
- AThe parent is liable to imprisonment of six months
- BThe parent is liable to a fine of Rs 10,000 as a first offence
- CThe parent is not liable for punishment for the first offenceCorrect
- DThe parent is liable to simple imprisonment of one month
Explanation
Section 14(1B) says that notwithstanding sub-sections (1) and (1A), parents or guardians are not liable for punishment in the case of the first offence. Only on a later like offence after conviction does section 14(2A) allow a fine up to Rs 10,000.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on The Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More The Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act questions
- Under the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, the appropriate Government must constitute the Child and Adole…
- Under the definitions in the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, who is the 'appropriate Government' for a m…
- A production house wishes to cast 10-year-old Aarav as an actor in a television serial. Which statement is correct under Section 3 of the Ac…
- Mehta Garments, a Surat firm, employs a child in contravention of section 3 of the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) …
- A ministry notifies that certain non-hazardous work may be done by adolescents. Which statement correctly reflects the Act's provision on th…
- A parent, Sunita, was earlier convicted for permitting her child to work in contravention of section 3. She commits a like offence again. Wh…