FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview
A portfolio has a one-day 99% VaR of USD 2.0 million, estimated under normality with zero mean. A risk manager wants the 10-day 99% VaR using the square-root-of-time rule. What is the result (to the nearest USD 0.01 million)?
The 10-day VaR is about USD 6.32 million. With zero-mean, independent normal returns, VaR grows with the square root of time, so the one-day figure of 2.0 million is multiplied by the square root of ten, roughly 3.162.
- AUSD 6.32 millionCorrect
- BUSD 20.00 million
- CUSD 2.00 million
- DUSD 3.16 million
Explanation
Under iid normal returns with zero mean, VaR scales with the square root of the horizon: 2.0 × √10 = 2.0 × 3.1623 = 6.32 million. Multiplying by 10 (20.00) wrongly scales linearly; 3.16 is just √10 without the base VaR.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview questions
- A bank's risk report shows a point estimate of expected shortfall (ES) from historical simulation but no measure of its precision. A reviewe…
- A risk manager notes that a 1-year historical simulation window used for VaR contains only a calm market period, and the VaR estimate is ver…
- A desk's estimated one-day 99% VaR is 3.00% of portfolio value, with an estimated standard error of 0.20%. Assuming the estimator is approxi…
- A risk analyst uses 500 daily P&L observations to estimate 1-day 95% historical simulation VaR. Which statement best describes how the estim…
- A risk analyst plots the quantiles of a sample of daily portfolio returns (vertical axis) against the quantiles of a standard normal distrib…
- A risk analyst estimates one-day historical-simulation VaR from the same 1,000-day return sample at both the 95% and the 99% confidence leve…