FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview
A portfolio has a one-day 95% VaR of USD 1.5 million under a normal, zero-mean, i.i.d. assumption (z at 95% = 1.645). Using the square-root-of-time rule, what is the approximate 10-day VaR at the 99% confidence level (z at 99% = 2.326)?
The 10-day 99% VaR is about USD 6.71 million. Back out daily volatility of about 0.912 million from the 95% VaR, multiply by 2.326 to get a 99% one-day VaR of 2.12 million, then scale by the square root of 10.
- AUSD 6.71 millionCorrect
- BUSD 4.74 million
- CUSD 2.12 million
- DUSD 15.0 million
Explanation
Daily sigma = 1.5/1.645 = 0.9119 million. The 1-day 99% VaR = 2.326 x 0.9119 = 2.121 million. The 10-day VaR = 2.121 x sqrt(10) = 2.121 x 3.162 = 6.71 million. The 4.74 figure results from scaling by sqrt(5) instead; 2.12 omits the horizon scaling.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview questions
- A risk manager is deciding whether to model the tail of a P&L series with a normal distribution or a Student t distribution. She produces tw…
- An analyst builds a QQ plot of 200 daily returns against a normal distribution fitted by sample mean and standard deviation. The plot is a s…
- A bank backtests a VaR model and notes that the 95% confidence interval around its 99% VaR estimate is very wide. Which interpretation is mo…
- An analyst compares the quantiles of a sample of loss data with those of a reference distribution in a QQ plot. The plotted points form an a…
- Which statement about using QQ plots to assess whether a return sample follows a hypothesised distribution is most accurate?
- A risk manager is evaluating whether to replace 99% VaR with a spectral risk measure. Which property distinguishes a spectral risk measure f…