ACCA Applied Skills · Performance Management · Planning and operational variances
Bram Co budgeted to produce 1,000 units using 4 hours of labour per unit at a standard rate of $15 per hour. Because of a new national wage agreement, the revised standard rate is $16 per hour. Actual production was 1,000 units, using 4,200 hours at $16.50 per hour. What is the operational labour rate variance?
The operational labour rate variance is $2,100 adverse. It compares the revised standard rate of $16 with the actual rate of $16.50, a difference of $0.50, multiplied by the 4,200 actual hours worked.
- A$2,100 adverseCorrect
- B$4,200 adverse
- C$2,100 favourable
- D$4,000 adverse
Explanation
Operational rate variance = (revised standard rate – actual rate) × actual hours = (16 – 16.50) × 4,200 = $2,100 adverse. Option B uses the original rate of $15 which would combine planning and operational effects ($1.50 × 2,800 is not relevant), and option D is the planning variance on standard hours (1 × 4,000).
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Planning and operational variances shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Planning and operational variances questions
- Brindle Co budgeted 3 labour hours per unit at an original standard rate of $10 per hour. The ex-post (revised) standard is 3.5 hours per un…
- A company set a standard material price of $10 per kg. Due to a market-wide shortage, the actual price paid was $12 per kg, and the ex-post …
- Tarn Co originally budgeted a material price of $5 per litre. The revised ex-post price was $6 per litre. The purchasing manager bought 10,0…
- Tarn Co's original standard price for material was $8 per kg. The ex-post price was $9 per kg. Actual purchases were 5,000 kg at $8.70 per k…
- Marsh Co uses a revised standard labour rate of $14 per hour. For the period, 5,200 hours were paid at $14.50 per hour, of which 300 hours w…
- Which of the following labour variances would most appropriately be classified as a planning variance rather than an operational variance?