ACCA Applied Knowledge · Business and Technology · Corporate codes of ethics
Brannock Ltd's code of ethics prohibits bribery, but sales staff are paid bonuses solely on hitting aggressive targets, and no one has been disciplined for breaches. Which is the most accurate assessment?
The code is likely to be undermined. Target-only bonuses encourage staff to cut corners, and the absence of discipline shows breaches are tolerated. A code needs aligned reward systems and consistent enforcement; a written prohibition alone does not change behaviour.
- AThe code is effective because it clearly prohibits bribery in writing
- BThe code is likely to be undermined because reward systems and lack of enforcement conflict with its stated valuesCorrect
- CThe code is unnecessary because bribery is already illegal
Explanation
Incentives that reward results at any cost, together with no sanctions for breaches, signal that the code is not taken seriously. A written prohibition alone is not enough. Legal prohibition does not remove the benefit of a code reinforcing expected conduct.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Corporate codes of ethics shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Corporate codes of ethics questions
- Which of the following is the main purpose of a corporate code of ethics?
- Which of the following is MOST likely to be included in the content of a corporate code of ethics?
- Zentra Ltd is drafting a code of ethics. The board wants employees to know what to do if they suspect wrongdoing by a colleague. Which conte…
- A company has published a code of ethics but managers never refer to it, no training is given and nobody is disciplined for breaches. What i…
- Which of the following is a benefit to a company of having a published corporate code of ethics?
- Which of the following is a limitation of relying on a corporate code of ethics alone to promote ethical behaviour?