ACCA Strategic Professional · Strategic Business Reporting (International) · Provisions, contingencies and events after the reporting period
Delta Group, a listed parent, is finalising its financial statements to 31 March 20X6. It operates in a country where a new law, enacted in February 20X6, requires oil companies to restore sites at the end of production. Delta's finance director proposes to recognise a provision of $12m for restoration costs of a site not yet drilled, but expected to be drilled in 20X7, so that profit can be smoothed by being lower this year and released next year. Which response is correct under IAS 37 and ethical principles?
The provision should be rejected. Restoration of an undrilled site has no past obligating event, so there is no present obligation under IAS 37, and creating it to smooth profits is earnings management that breaches the fundamental ethical principles of integrity and objectivity.
- AAccept the proposal because the new law creates a legal obligation for all future sites
- BAccept it because prudence permits provisions to be built up in good years
- CReject the provision because no past event has occurred for the undrilled site, and the intent to smooth profit breaches the accountant's duty of integrity and objectivityCorrect
- DReject the provision only because the amount exceeds materiality, but disclose it as a contingent liability
Explanation
An obligating event for restoration is the drilling that causes the damage, which has not yet occurred, so there is no present obligation and no provision for future operating costs. Creating a provision for smoothing is earnings management, contrary to integrity and objectivity. Option 1 relies on prudence, which does not permit general reserves.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Provisions, contingencies and events after the reporting period shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Provisions, contingencies and events after the reporting period questions
- Sigma Ltd's finance director asks the financial controller to omit disclosure of a material contingent liability for an environmental claim,…
- Zephyr Ltd has a reporting date of 31 December 20X5 and its financial statements were authorised for issue on 10 March 20X6. On 20 February …
- Bramwell Co decides on 15 December 20X5 to close a division. A detailed formal plan was approved by the board, but no announcement was made …
- Orion plc is claiming $2m compensation from a supplier for defective goods. At the reporting date, Orion's lawyers say it is probable that t…
- Brava plc has a 31 March 20X6 year end and the financial statements were authorised on 20 June 20X6. On 15 May 20X6 a fire destroyed a wareh…
- Tandor Co operates an offshore platform and must remove it at the end of its 10-year life. It is obliged to do so because of installing it. …