ACCA Strategic Professional · Strategic Business Reporting (International) · Provisions, contingencies and events after the reporting period
Zephyr Ltd has a reporting date of 31 December 20X5 and its financial statements were authorised for issue on 10 March 20X6. On 20 February 20X6 a major customer, Orion Co, was declared insolvent. The receivable of $400,000 at 31 December 20X5 related to sales made in 20X5, and the customer's financial difficulties had been developing before the year end. How should Zephyr treat this?
The financial statements should be adjusted to write off the receivable. The customer's insolvency after the reporting date, but before authorisation, provides evidence of conditions that existed at the reporting date, so under IAS 10 it is an adjusting event.
- AAdjust the financial statements to write off the receivable as an adjusting eventCorrect
- BDisclose the insolvency as a non-adjusting event only
- CIgnore it because it occurred after the reporting date
- DRecognise the loss in the 20X6 financial statements only
Explanation
Insolvency of a customer after the reporting date normally confirms that the receivable was impaired at the reporting date, so it is an adjusting event under IAS 10. The event occurred before authorisation, so the receivable is written down. Disclosure only (option 2) would be wrong because the evidence relates to conditions existing at year end.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Provisions, contingencies and events after the reporting period shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Provisions, contingencies and events after the reporting period questions
- Zenith plc decides on 15 December 20X5 to close a factory. Detailed formal plans were approved by the board on that date, but the plan was n…
- Tandor Co operates an offshore platform and must remove it at the end of its 10-year life. It is obliged to do so because of installing it. …
- Parent plc acquired 80% of Sub Ltd on 1 January 20X5. At the acquisition date Sub was defending a lawsuit. The fair value of the potential o…
- At 31 December 20X5, Kestrel Co has a legal case brought against it by a customer. Its lawyers advise that it is more likely than not that K…
- Orion plc has claimed $800,000 from an insurer for fire damage to a warehouse. At the reporting date the insurer has neither accepted nor re…
- Orchard Co has a 30 September 20X5 year end. Before the financial statements were authorised, the finance director, who is paid a bonus link…