CA Intermediate · Corporate and Other Laws · Incorporation of Company and Matters Incidental Thereto
Dinesh Pvt Ltd wants to change its name to a new one. A name is considered undesirable under the Companies (Incorporation) Rules if it is identical or too nearly resembles an existing company's name. Which of the following is the correct position?
A name is undesirable and unavailable if it is identical with, or too nearly resembles, the name of an existing company or a registered trade mark. Merely resembling names are therefore also barred, and use of a place name or the word Limited does not by itself make a name undesirable.
- AA name is undesirable only if identical with a registered company, and nearly resembling names are always allowed
- BA name that is identical with or too nearly resembles the name of an existing company or a registered trade mark is undesirable and will not be availableCorrect
- CAny name containing a place name is undesirable
- DA name is undesirable only when it includes the word 'Limited'
Explanation
A proposed name is not available if it is identical with or too nearly resembles the name of an existing company or a registered trade mark, among other grounds. Nearly resembling names are not allowed, so the first option is wrong. Place names are not barred.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Incorporation of Company and Matters Incidental Thereto shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Incorporation of Company and Matters Incidental Thereto questions
- Kavya Pvt Ltd's Articles say that every share transfer needs board approval. The Memorandum's objects clause does not mention real estate tr…
- Meera Textiles Pvt Ltd, a private company, wants to convert itself into a public company without changing its business. Its articles current…
- Kabir and Nisha are the only two members of Sunrise Foods Pvt Ltd, which was incorporated as a One Person Company by Kabir, who later admitt…
- Nirmal Textiles Pvt. Ltd. was incorporated in Pune. Its promoters carried on business on the basis of a certificate of incorporation, which …
- Meera, Tarun and Kabir, all residents of Pune, wish to form a private company to run a software business. They sign the memorandum, but Kabi…
- Ritu, a director of Lotus Products Ltd, claims that the company's Articles of Association can override a mandatory provision of the Companie…