CA Intermediate · Corporate and Other Laws · Incorporation of Company and Matters Incidental Thereto
Gaurav Exports Private Limited, an Indian company, has an Indian resident director, Sunita. The company's registered office is in Surat. It wants to change its registered office from Surat to a place within the same city but in another locality. Which statement is correct under the Companies Act, 2013?
Shifting the registered office within the same city, town or village needs only a board resolution, followed by notice to the Registrar within fifteen days of the change. Special resolutions, Regional Director approval or NCLT approval apply to larger shifts, not a change of locality within the same city.
- AThe change needs a special resolution and Regional Director approval
- BThe change within the same city needs only a board resolution and a notice to the Registrar in the prescribed form within 15 daysCorrect
- CThe change needs a special resolution and approval of the National Company Law Tribunal
- DThe change needs prior approval of the Registrar of Companies, who must publish it in the Official Gazette
Explanation
A shift of the registered office within the same city, town or village requires only a board resolution, and the company must give notice to the Registrar within 15 days of the change. A special resolution is needed for a change from one city to another within the same State, and Regional Director approval applies for a shift from one State to another or one RoC jurisdiction. So NCLT or Regional Director approval is not required here.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Incorporation of Company and Matters Incidental Thereto shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Incorporation of Company and Matters Incidental Thereto questions
- Sunrise Agro Pvt Ltd, incorporated in Pune, has its registered office at a rented premises. Two months after incorporation, the board wants …
- Pragati Ltd was incorporated, and later it was found that its certificate of incorporation was obtained by furnishing false information and …
- The Articles of Association of Lotus Foods Ltd contain a clause that conflicts with a mandatory provision of the Companies Act, 2013. A shar…
- Sundaram Traders Pvt Ltd, an existing company, wishes to change its name. Its board proposes a name that is identical to a name already regi…
- Dinesh Pvt Ltd wants to change its name to a new one. A name is considered undesirable under the Companies (Incorporation) Rules if it is id…
- Ananya, Bhaskar and Charu, all residents of Pune, wish to form a private company limited by shares to run a bakery. They have chosen the nam…