IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Risk Modelling and Survival Analysis · Introduction to extreme value theory
Fire losses for a portfolio are modelled as independent with a common exponential distribution with mean Rs 2 lakh. In a block of 3 claims, what is the probability that the largest claim is at most Rs 2 lakh?
The probability is (1 - e^-1) cubed, about 0.2526. One claim falls below its mean with probability 0.6321, and all three independent claims must do so for the maximum to be at most Rs 2 lakh.
- A(1 - e^-1)^3 ≈ 0.2526Correct
- B1 - e^-3 ≈ 0.9502
- C3(1 - e^-1) ≈ 1.896
- D(1 - e^-3)^3 ≈ 0.8580
- e^-3 ≈ 0.0498
Explanation
F(2 lakh) = 1 - e^-1 = 0.6321. P(max <= 2 lakh) = F^3 = 0.6321^3 = 0.2526. Using e^-3 or 1 - e^-3 wrongly treats the event as a single claim exceeding a threshold of 3 means.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Introduction to extreme value theory shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Introduction to extreme value theory questions
- A GEV distribution has location mu = 50, scale sigma = 10 and shape xi = -0.5. Its distribution function is F(x) = exp(-[1 + xi(x-mu)/sigma]…
- Losses are independent and uniformly distributed on (0, 1) (in Rs crore). For a block of n = 5 losses, what is the expected value of the blo…
- A GEV distribution has shape parameter ξ = 0.4. Which statement about the tail of this distribution is correct?
- Block maxima of daily losses are modelled by a GEV distribution with shape ξ > 0 after suitable normalisation. Which statement is correct?
- A reinsurer uses annual block maxima of fire losses. Which is a recognised drawback of the block maxima method compared with peaks over thre…
- Using the same GPD tail model (threshold u, shape ξ with 0 < ξ < 1, scale β), the expected shortfall at level p is ES_p = VaR_p/(1 − ξ) + (β…