CS Professional · Corporate Restructuring, Valuation and Insolvency · Regulatory Approvals of Scheme
Ganga Holdings Ltd validly gave notice under section 235 to a dissenting shareholder, Mr Rao, of Yamuna Ltd. Mr Rao did not apply to the Tribunal. Yamuna Ltd then received the price from Ganga and registered Ganga as holder of his shares. Which statement is correct?
Yamuna Ltd must pay the sum into a separate bank account, hold it in trust for the entitled shareholders, and disburse it within sixty days. It must also inform dissenting shareholders of the registration and receipt within one month of registration, so using the funds otherwise is wrong.
- AYamuna must hold the sum in a separate bank account in trust and disburse it to entitled shareholders within sixty daysCorrect
- BYamuna may use the sum for working capital for one year
- CMr Rao must be informed only after sixty days
- DGanga keeps the price until Mr Rao claims it
Explanation
Under section 235(4), sums received by the transferor company are paid into a separate bank account and held in trust for those entitled, to be disbursed within sixty days. Section 235(3)(b) also requires informing dissenters within one month of registration. Using the money as working capital breaches the trust.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Regulatory Approvals of Scheme shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Regulatory Approvals of Scheme questions
- A student preparing a note on the Companies Act, 2013 claims that a Rehabilitation and Insolvency Fund under Section 269 can finance the rev…
- Under a scheme, Sagar Ltd (transferee) offered to buy shares of Tara Ltd. Within four months of the offer, holders of 92% in value of the sh…
- Gangotri Steels Ltd's board proposes to approach the Tribunal for sanction of a revival scheme and wants the sanctioned scheme to bind all c…
- Godavari Steels Ltd's sanctioned arrangement is only partly workable, but the company can still pay its debts as per the scheme. Can the Tri…
- After the Tribunal sanctioned the arrangement of Narmada Agro Ltd, it appointed no one to monitor progress. Which statement about the Tribun…
- Bharat Polymers Ltd's arrangement was sanctioned, but the Tribunal is satisfied that it cannot be implemented satisfactorily even with modif…