CS Professional · Corporate Restructuring, Valuation and Insolvency · Regulatory Approvals of Scheme
Under a scheme, Sagar Ltd (transferee) offered to buy shares of Tara Ltd. Within four months of the offer, holders of 92% in value of the shares whose transfer is involved (excluding shares already held by Sagar Ltd) approved. Sagar Ltd wishes to acquire the dissenters' shares. Which statement is correct?
Sagar Ltd may give notice to dissenting shareholders at any time within two months after the four-month period expires. Approval by 92% in value exceeds the nine-tenths threshold in section 235(1), so unanimity is not needed.
- AIt may give notice to dissenting shareholders within two months after the expiry of the four monthsCorrect
- BIt may give notice only within one month of the offer
- CIt cannot proceed, as unanimity is needed
- DIt may give notice at any time within six months after the approval, with no limit
Explanation
Section 235(1): approval by at least nine-tenths in value within four months of the offer lets the transferee give notice at any time within two months after the four months expire. 92% exceeds nine-tenths, so the threshold is met; the other time limits are not in the section.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Regulatory Approvals of Scheme shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Regulatory Approvals of Scheme questions
- The Tribunal sanctions a compromise proposed by the Company Liquidator of Iyer Pharma Ltd, subject to the condition that the settlement amou…
- Narmada Pharma Ltd's scheme was sanctioned by the Tribunal before the Companies Act, 2013 commenced, under the earlier law. The scheme is no…
- Patel Chemicals Ltd is being wound up by the Tribunal. Its Company Liquidator proposes to make a compromise with a creditor who claims a con…
- Sharma Steels Ltd's secretary says that once the Tribunal sanctions a scheme, it becomes binding on all members and creditors under Section …
- Ganga Cement Ltd had a compromise sanctioned by a court order passed before the Companies Act, 2013 commenced. Its implementation is now fal…
- Ganga Holdings Ltd validly gave notice under section 235 to a dissenting shareholder, Mr Rao, of Yamuna Ltd. Mr Rao did not apply to the Tri…