CA Final · Financial Reporting · Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
Ganga Pharma Ltd. discusses Ind AS 37 terminology with its auditors. Which statement correctly reflects how the Standard uses the term 'contingent'?
Within Ind AS 37, 'contingent' describes liabilities and assets that are not recognised because their existence will be confirmed only by the occurrence or non-occurrence of uncertain future events not wholly within the entity's control. Provisions are uncertain in timing or amount but are still recognised.
- AIt applies to all provisions, because every provision is recognised only when an uncertain future event occurs
- BIt is used for liabilities and assets not recognised because their existence will be confirmed only by uncertain future events not wholly within the entity's controlCorrect
- CIt is used only for assets whose amount cannot be measured
- DIt is used for any liability for which settlement is expected to be after twelve months
Explanation
Para 12 says that although provisions are uncertain in timing or amount, 'contingent' within the Standard is used for liabilities and assets not recognised because existence will be confirmed only by uncertain future events not wholly within the entity's control. The first option wrongly applies the term to provisions, and the others invent definitions.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Ind AS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets questions
- Bharat Pumps Ltd has a present obligation from a past event and an outflow is probable, but, due to the nature of the matter, no sufficientl…
- Sutlej Fabrics Ltd is defending a customer claim. Its lawyers advise that the company probably has no present obligation, but the court's de…
- Kaveri Engineering Ltd has a present obligation arising from a past event. Settlement is considered possible but not probable, and the amoun…
- Gomti Foods Ltd has a present obligation from a past event and it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will …
- A reviewer states that, in a general sense, all provisions are contingent because they are uncertain in timing or amount. Hari Steels Ltd's …
- Under Ind AS 37, Aravali Pharma Ltd is sued by a former distributor. Management concludes that a present obligation exists, but it is not pr…