CS Professional · Intellectual Property Rights - Law and Practice · Patent Documentation, Examination and Infringement
In Nirmal Auto's infringement suit, the court finds claim 1 valid and infringed, but claim 4 invalid. Nirmal proves claim 4 was framed in good faith and with reasonable skill and knowledge. Under section 114, what follows?
The court must grant relief on the valid infringed claim, subject to its discretion on costs and the date from which damages or account of profits are reckoned. Section 114(2) applies because the invalid claim was framed in good faith with reasonable skill and knowledge.
- ARelief is limited strictly to an injunction on claim 1
- BThe court must grant relief on the valid infringed claim, with discretion over costs and the date from which damages or account of profits runCorrect
- CThe whole patent fails because one claim is invalid
- DThe court cannot award damages under any circumstances
Explanation
Under section 114(1), relief on a valid infringed claim is ordinarily by injunction only. Section 114(2) lifts that limit where the plaintiff proves the invalid claim was framed in good faith and with reasonable skill and knowledge: the court shall grant relief on the valid claim, subject to its discretion on costs and the date from which damages or profits are reckoned.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Patent Documentation, Examination and Infringement shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Patent Documentation, Examination and Infringement questions
- Rohan Biotech, a patentee, applies to the Controller under section 57 to amend its specification. Meanwhile, a suit for infringement of the …
- Anita Dynamics Ltd filed an application, and the Controller issued a secrecy direction under Section 35. The direction was later revoked. Re…
- Zenith Agro Pvt Ltd's patent application for a drought-resistant seed treatment was published on 1 March, and no patent has yet been granted…
- Meera Pharma holds an exclusive licence of a patent from the patentee, Dr. Rao, effective 1 April. Hari Labs infringed the patent on 15 Marc…
- Vikram Engineering made a request for examination of its application under Section 11B. Which statement about what follows and about the rul…
- Anil Engineering filed Application A in India on 1 April. Another applicant, Bharat Motors, filed Application B on 1 July claiming the same …