CS Professional · Corporate Restructuring, Valuation and Insolvency · Regulatory Approvals of Scheme
Mehta Textiles Ltd's advisor drafts a note stating that a scheme of revival and rehabilitation of a sick company will be sanctioned by the Tribunal under Section 262 of the Companies Act, 2013. As per the official text of the Act, what is the correct position?
Section 262 on sanction of scheme has been omitted from the Companies Act, 2013 with effect from 15 November 2016. The advisor's note therefore relies on a provision that no longer exists. Sections 261, 263 and 264 were omitted on the same date.
- ASection 262 is currently in force and empowers the Tribunal to sanction such schemes
- BSection 262 has been omitted with effect from 15 November 2016, so the note relies on a provision no longer in the ActCorrect
- CSection 262 now applies only to private companies
- DSection 262 has been replaced by Section 263, which now governs sanction
Explanation
The official text shows that Section 262 (Sanction of scheme) was omitted by section 255 and the Eleventh Schedule of the amending Act w.e.f. 15-11-2016. Section 263 was omitted at the same time, so option D is wrong. The note cannot rely on Section 262.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Regulatory Approvals of Scheme shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Regulatory Approvals of Scheme questions
- Gangotri Steels Ltd's board proposes to approach the Tribunal for sanction of a revival scheme and wants the sanctioned scheme to bind all c…
- Sunrise Textiles Ltd, a sick industrial company in Coimbatore, wants to file an application before the Tribunal under Section 254 of the Com…
- Godavari Steels Ltd's sanctioned arrangement is only partly workable, but the company can still pay its debts as per the scheme. Can the Tri…
- A draft board note for Kaveri Textiles Ltd states that an arrangement with its creditors binds the company and the creditors under Section 3…
- After the Tribunal sanctioned the arrangement of Narmada Agro Ltd, it appointed no one to monitor progress. Which statement about the Tribun…
- Bharat Polymers Ltd's arrangement was sanctioned, but the Tribunal is satisfied that it cannot be implemented satisfactorily even with modif…