CS Professional · Corporate Restructuring, Valuation and Insolvency · Regulatory Approvals of Scheme
A draft board note for Kaveri Textiles Ltd states that an arrangement with its creditors binds the company and the creditors under Section 321 of the Companies Act, 2013. Which statement correctly describes Section 321 in the official text?
Section 321 on arrangements binding the company and creditors has been omitted by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with effect from 15 November 2016. The board note is therefore wrong to rely on it. Section 263 is also omitted, so it cannot replace Section 321.
- ASection 321 is operative and binds creditors once a majority in value agrees
- BSection 321 is operative but only for companies being wound up voluntarily
- CSection 321 was omitted by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 with effect from 15 November 2016Correct
- DSection 321 was omitted, but Section 263 now performs its function
Explanation
The official text records that Section 321 (Arrangement when binding on company and creditors) is omitted by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 255 and the Eleventh Schedule, with effect from 15-11-2016. The last option is wrong because Section 263 is itself omitted and cannot take over any function.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Regulatory Approvals of Scheme shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Regulatory Approvals of Scheme questions
- Under a scheme, Sagar Ltd (transferee) offered to buy shares of Tara Ltd. Within four months of the offer, holders of 92% in value of the sh…
- Narmada Pharma Ltd's scheme was sanctioned by the Tribunal before the Companies Act, 2013 commenced, under the earlier law. The scheme is no…
- Patel Chemicals Ltd is being wound up by the Tribunal. Its Company Liquidator proposes to make a compromise with a creditor who claims a con…
- Sharma Steels Ltd's secretary says that once the Tribunal sanctions a scheme, it becomes binding on all members and creditors under Section …
- Ganga Cement Ltd had a compromise sanctioned by a court order passed before the Companies Act, 2013 commenced. Its implementation is now fal…
- Ganga Holdings Ltd validly gave notice under section 235 to a dissenting shareholder, Mr Rao, of Yamuna Ltd. Mr Rao did not apply to the Tri…