CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Liability to Pay in Certain Cases
Mr. Raghav Iyer, a registered sole proprietor trading in hardware, died on 10 July. His son Karthik continued the same business from 15 July under the existing premises. A demand of tax and interest for earlier periods, pertaining to Raghav's supplies, was determined on 20 August. Who is liable to pay the dues under the CGST Act?
Karthik is liable, because when a business is continued after the proprietor's death, the legal representative or other person continuing it must pay the tax, interest or penalty due from the deceased, whether determined before or after the death.
- AKarthik, as the person continuing the business, is liable to pay the tax and interest due from RaghavCorrect
- BNo one, because the liability of a proprietor ends on his death
- CKarthik is liable only up to the value of the estate inherited, even though the business is continued
- DThe department must wait until the business is discontinued before recovering the dues
Explanation
Where a person liable to pay tax dies and the business is continued by a legal representative or any other person, that person is liable for the tax, interest or penalty due from the deceased. This holds whether the amount was determined before or after death. The estate-limited liability applies only where the business is discontinued, so the third option is wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Liability to Pay in Certain Cases shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Liability to Pay in Certain Cases questions
- Ramesh was a guardian running a business for his ward Ishaan, a minor, and was registered under GST as the taxable person. The guardianship …
- Kapoor & Sons, a registered partnership with partners Dev and Esha, admitted Farhan as a new partner and Esha retired in the same reconstitu…
- M/s Sharma & Verma, a partnership firm, was dissolved on 31 March. Its partners were Anil, Bhavna and Chetan. In July, the proper officer de…
- Gupta Traders, a firm with partners Hari and Indu, owed GST for the period before 1 April. On 1 April Indu retired and Jatin was admitted as…
- Sunrise Traders, a partnership firm, was dissolved on 31 March. Partners Anil, Bhavna and Chetan were partners at dissolution. In July, tax …
- Kavya Textiles HUF, a registered taxable person, has a tax demand of ₹4,50,000 for the period up to 31 March. On 1 April the HUF property wa…