Skip to content

ACCA Strategic Professional · Strategic Business Leader · Enabling success: talent management

Orion Services plans to downsize by 15% and proposes to select staff for redundancy mainly on the basis of age and length of service, retaining younger lower-paid employees. Which assessment of the proposal is most appropriate for a professional accountant advising the board?

The proposal is problematic because selecting people for redundancy by age is likely discriminatory and unethical, exposing Orion to legal and reputational risk. The board should use objective, job-related selection criteria and fair consultation instead, even when cost reduction is the goal.

  1. AAcceptable, because cost reduction is the board's overriding duty
  2. BAcceptable provided the selection is not communicated to staff
  3. CProblematic, because age-based selection is likely to be discriminatory and unethical; objective, job-related criteria and fair consultation should be usedCorrect
  4. DAppropriate only if the affected employees are offered a share option

Explanation

Selecting on age is discriminatory in many jurisdictions and breaches fair-treatment principles, creating legal, reputational and morale risks. Fair practice uses objective, job-related criteria and consultation. Secrecy or compensation does not remove the ethical and legal problem, and cost reduction does not override fairness.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Enabling success: talent management shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Enabling success: talent management questions