IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Actuarial Statistics · Hypothesis testing and goodness of fit
Paired differences (after minus before) in monthly premium collection efficiency for 9 branches have mean 1.5 and sample standard deviation 3.0. Assuming normal differences, a two-sided 5% test of H0: mean difference = 0 is carried out. The critical value from t with 8 degrees of freedom is 2.306. Which conclusion is correct?
The statistic is 1.5 and H0 is not rejected. The standard error is 3 divided by root 9, which equals 1, so t is 1.5, below the two-sided 5% critical value of 2.306 on 8 degrees of freedom.
- At = 0.50, do not reject H0
- Bt = 1.50, do not reject H0Correct
- Ct = 1.50, reject H0
- Dt = 4.50, reject H0
- t = 0.50, reject H0
Explanation
Standard error = 3/sqrt(9) = 1. So t = 1.5/1 = 1.5, which is less than 2.306 in absolute value, so H0 is not rejected. Option 0.50 divides by s alone... 1.5/3 = 0.5 is the wrong standard error, and 4.5 multiplies by 3.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Hypothesis testing and goodness of fit shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Hypothesis testing and goodness of fit questions
- For a likelihood ratio test comparing a Poisson model with a single rate (H0) against a model with separate rates for 4 independent risk gro…
- A sequence of 12 claims is classified as above (A) or below (B) the median: A A B B B A B A A A B B. How many runs does the sequence contain…
- Policy claim counts per year are grouped as 0, 1, 2, 3 or more, with observed numbers 60, 30, 8, 2 from 100 policies. The model fitted (para…
- A Poisson distribution is fitted to claim counts per policy by estimating the mean from the data. After grouping the counts into the categor…
- Independent normal samples have sizes 11 and 16 with sample variances 30 and 12. To test H0: sigma1^2 = sigma2^2 against H1: sigma1^2 > sigm…
- A chi-squared goodness-of-fit test is applied to 200 policies grouped into 6 cells, testing a Poisson distribution whose mean was estimated …