CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Liability to Pay in Certain Cases
Prakash, a trustee, carried on a trading business under a trust for a minor beneficiary, Neha. The trustee's registration continued until the trust terminated on 31 December when Neha attained majority. In February, tax for the period up to 31 December was determined against the trustee. Which statement is correct?
Neha is liable. If a trustee carrying on business for a beneficiary has the trust terminated, the beneficiary must pay the tax, interest or penalty due from the trustee up to termination, even if determined afterwards.
- APrakash alone remains liable because the demand was determined after the trust ended
- BThe liability is extinguished on termination of the trust
- CNeha, the beneficiary, is liable to pay the tax due from the trustee up to the termination of the trustCorrect
- DNeha is liable only for periods after 31 December
Explanation
Where a trustee carries on business under a trust for a beneficiary and the trust terminates, the beneficiary is liable to pay tax, interest or penalty due from the trustee up to the time of termination. This applies whether it was determined before or after termination. So the demand determined in February falls on Neha.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Liability to Pay in Certain Cases shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Liability to Pay in Certain Cases questions
- Mehta HUF, a registered taxable person, partitioned its property among members Raj, Sunil and a group comprising Tara and her son on 1 Janua…
- Mr. Ramesh Iyer, a sole proprietor registered under GST, died on 10 June. His business was discontinued on the date of death. GST of Rs 3,00…
- Ramesh was a guardian running a business for his ward Ishaan, a minor, and was registered under GST as the taxable person. The guardianship …
- Goods worth ₹6,00,000 were found in a vehicle with no identifiable owner, and the proper officer believes that delay in assessment may harm …
- Kapoor & Sons, a registered partnership with partners Dev and Esha, admitted Farhan as a new partner and Esha retired in the same reconstitu…
- M/s Sharma & Verma, a partnership firm, was dissolved on 31 March. Its partners were Anil, Bhavna and Chetan. In July, the proper officer de…