CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Returns
Registration of Anand Components was cancelled by the proper officer. The cancellation order was served on 1 April, and revocation was applied for on time. The proper officer passed the revocation order in FORM GST REG-22 on 15 September. Returns were due for the period from the date of the cancellation order up to the date of the revocation order. Under Rule 23, by when must these returns be furnished, and within what period must the officer decide an application he is satisfied with?
The returns must be furnished within thirty days of the revocation order, so by 15 October. The officer, if satisfied, must pass the REG-22 revocation order within thirty days of receiving the application. Seven working days applies only to replying to a show cause notice.
- AReturns within thirty days of the revocation order, that is by 15 October; the officer must pass the REG-22 order within thirty days of receipt of the applicationCorrect
- BReturns within ninety days of the revocation order; the officer must pass the order within seven working days
- CReturns within thirty days of the cancellation order; the officer must pass the order within ninety days
- DReturns before the revocation order; the officer must pass the order within fifteen days
Explanation
The second proviso requires all returns due from the cancellation order date until the revocation order date to be furnished within thirty days of the revocation order. From 15 September, thirty days ends on 15 October. Rule 23(2)(a) requires the officer to revoke by REG-22 within thirty days of receipt of the application. Seven working days is the time for replying to a REG-23 show cause notice, so the second option mixes this up.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Returns shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Returns questions
- On scrutiny, the officer informs Manoj Enterprises of discrepancies in its return. Manoj Enterprises accepts the discrepancies but does not …
- Mehta Components Ltd received an ASMT-10 notice about a discrepancy in its return. It accepted the discrepancy, paid the tax and interest, a…
- Kaveri Traders' return for a month was selected for scrutiny. The proper officer noticed a mismatch and issued FORM GST ASMT-10 on 5 March. …
- The proper officer revoked the cancellation of registration of Lakshmi Stores by an order in FORM GST REG-22 on 10 September, without retros…
- Under section 61, a registered person, Anil Steels, was informed of discrepancies in its return. It gave no satisfactory explanation within …
- The proper officer selected the return of Kaveri Agro Ltd for scrutiny and found a discrepancy. He issued a notice in FORM GST ASMT-10 on 5 …