CS Professional · Intellectual Property Rights - Law and Practice · Trademarks
Sundaram Foods, proprietor of the registered mark 'SUNRISE' for biscuits, plans to assign it to Bharat Bakers but is worried that Sundaram would keep a similar mark for the same goods. It submits a statement of case to the Registrar, who certifies that the assignment would be valid. Bharat Bakers applies to register its title eight months after the certificate is issued. Under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, what is the effect of the certificate?
The certificate is not conclusive here. A Registrar's certificate in favour of validity is conclusive only if the application to register the assignee's title is made within six months of issue. Eight months have passed, so the protection under section 40(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 is lost.
- AIt remains conclusive of validity because the certificate was issued by the Registrar
- BIt is conclusive of validity only if the application to register the title is made within six months of issue, so it is not conclusive hereCorrect
- CIt has no effect because certificates are never issued for proposed assignments
- DIt is conclusive of invalidity regardless of timing
Explanation
Under section 40(2) a certificate is conclusive, subject to appeal and fraud, on the facts stated. For a certificate in favour of validity, this holds only if the application under section 45 is made within six months of issue. Eight months exceeds this, so conclusiveness is lost.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Trademarks shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Trademarks questions
- Asha Textiles is prosecuted for an offence relating to a registered trade mark of Bharat Looms. In court, Asha pleads that the registration …
- Kavita Herbals registered a mark in India and obtained an international registration based on it. Three years after the international regist…
- Rohan Appliances applies to register, as a trade mark, the three-dimensional shape of an electric kettle whose form is dictated solely by th…
- Arjun, a licensee of a registered mark, is only a permitted user and is not a registered user. He finds a counterfeiter selling goods under …
- Ravi, owner of an unregistered mark, sues a competitor for passing off. The competitor proves he began using the mark unaware, with no reaso…
- Meera Foods is the registered proprietor of 'MEERA' for pickles. It sues Dev Traders for infringement and wins. Meera Foods asks the court f…