CS Executive · Jurisprudence, Interpretation and General Laws · Law relating to Evidence
Sunil, a suitor in a civil case, fails to bring a bond on which he relies to the first hearing. He later seeks to produce it. What is the effect of Section 3 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023?
Section 3 does not allow Sunil to produce the bond later as of right. He can do so only in accordance with the conditions prescribed by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, because the section cannot enable proof barred by civil procedure law.
- AThe section lets him produce the bond at any later stage since it proves a fact in issue
- BThe section does not enable him to produce it at a later stage except as the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 allowsCorrect
- CThe bond is automatically inadmissible forever under the Adhiniyam
- DThe section lets the court admit it only if the opposite party consents in writing
Explanation
The Explanation to Section 3 says it does not enable a person to prove a fact he is disentitled to prove under the law relating to civil procedure. Illustration (b) says the bond may be produced later only in accordance with the conditions in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Option A ignores this limit.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Law relating to Evidence shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Law relating to Evidence questions
- Meera is prosecuted for causing grievous hurt. She says that she acted under grave and sudden provocation, which is a recognised exception i…
- Ravi is tried for causing the death of Meena by beating her with a club. Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, which of the following…
- In a recovery suit, Meera Traders' witness has been cross-examined by the defendant on a matter first raised in cross-examination. Meera Tra…
- Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, which of the following is expressly excluded from the meaning of "Court"?
- Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, the examination of a witness by the party who calls him is known as:
- Dhruv's company denies the existence of a written agreement, but Dhruv's own letter admits in writing that the original agreement existed an…