CS Professional · Intellectual Property Rights - Law and Practice · Patent Documentation, Examination and Infringement
Sunita's application is subject to a secrecy direction issued under section 35, and the time for requesting examination would otherwise have lapsed during that direction. Which statement is correct under section 11B?
The request for examination may be made within the prescribed period from the date the secrecy direction is revoked. The proviso to section 11B(4) protects such applicants from deemed withdrawal, though a request is still needed before examination begins.
- AThe application is automatically treated as withdrawn once the period lapses
- BThe request for examination may be made within the prescribed period from the date of revocation of the secrecy directionCorrect
- CExamination can never be requested after a secrecy direction
- DThe Controller must examine it without any request
Explanation
Proviso (ii) to section 11B(4) says where a secrecy direction has been issued under section 35, the request for examination may be made within the prescribed period from the date of revocation of the direction. So deemed withdrawal does not automatically follow, and a request is still required.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Patent Documentation, Examination and Infringement shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Patent Documentation, Examination and Infringement questions
- Arjun Tools sues Bharat Fabricators for patent infringement. Bharat proves that when it made the infringing sales it was not aware and had n…
- Rohan Biotech, a patentee, applies to the Controller under section 57 to amend its specification. Meanwhile, a suit for infringement of the …
- Anita Dynamics Ltd filed an application, and the Controller issued a secrecy direction under Section 35. The direction was later revoked. Re…
- Zenith Agro Pvt Ltd's patent application for a drought-resistant seed treatment was published on 1 March, and no patent has yet been granted…
- Vikram Engineering made a request for examination of its application under Section 11B. Which statement about what follows and about the rul…
- Anil Engineering filed Application A in India on 1 April. Another applicant, Bharat Motors, filed Application B on 1 July claiming the same …