Skip to content

ACCA Strategic Professional · Strategic Business Leader · Management and internal control systems

Tessera Energy plc's internal audit plan is currently built around a rotating cycle that audits every department once every three years. Following a major strategic expansion into new overseas markets and a cyber incident at a competitor, the audit committee wants internal audit to add most value. Which approach best fits this aim?

A risk-based internal audit plan, linked to the risk register and strategy and updated as risks change, adds the most value. It focuses on high-risk areas like overseas expansion and cyber security, unlike a fixed rotating cycle or duplicating external audit work.

  1. ARetain the three-year cycle so every area receives equal coverage
  2. BConcentrate on re-performing the external auditor's financial statement tests
  3. CAdopt a risk-based plan, linked to the board's risk register and strategy, prioritising high-risk areas such as overseas operations and IT security, and updated as risks changeCorrect
  4. DRestrict the plan to compliance checks on procedures that management specifies

Explanation

A risk-based plan aligns audit effort with the organisation's significant and changing risks and strategy, giving the board the most relevant assurance. A fixed cycle gives equal coverage regardless of risk, duplicating external audit adds little, and management-directed compliance checks limit independence and value.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Management and internal control systems shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Management and internal control systems questions