Skip to content

CA Foundation · Quantitative Aptitude · Correlation and Regression

The coefficient of correlation between a firm's advertising expenditure and its sales is −0.6. What percentage of the variation in sales is NOT explained by the linear relationship with advertising expenditure?

The unexplained variation is 64%. The coefficient of determination is r² = 0.36, meaning 36% of the variation in sales is explained by advertising. The remainder, 100% − 36% = 64%, is unexplained. The sign of r does not matter here.

  1. A36%
  2. B64%Correct
  3. C60%
  4. D40%

Explanation

The coefficient of determination is r² = (−0.6)² = 0.36, so 36% of the variation is explained. The unexplained part is 1 − 0.36 = 0.64, that is 64%. The option 36% is the explained share, not the unexplained share.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Correlation and Regression shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Correlation and Regression questions