CS Professional · Banking and Insurance - Laws and Practice · Consumer Protection
The Minister of Consumer Affairs in a State chairs the State Consumer Protection Council. The Council met only once during a calendar year. Under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, what is the position?
The Council is not compliant. The State Consumer Protection Council meets as and when necessary, but the Act requires not less than two meetings every year. A single meeting falls short of this statutory minimum, though quarterly meetings are not required.
- ACompliant, since it meets whenever necessary
- BNot compliant, since not less than two meetings must be held every yearCorrect
- CCompliant, since one meeting a year is the minimum
- DNot compliant, since it must meet quarterly
Explanation
Section 6(3) says the State Council meets as and when necessary but not less than two meetings shall be held every year. One meeting is below this minimum. The Act does not require quarterly meetings, so the last option overstates the requirement.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Consumer Protection shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Consumer Protection questions
- A State Government in India wants two separate forums to hear consumer complaints in a populous district, Pune. Under the Consumer Protectio…
- Meenakshi, a bank customer in Chennai, reads that a body has been set up under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 to regulate violation of co…
- A dispute against a lender is pending before a State Commission, where a borrower alleges unfair trade practices. Which statement about the …
- Consider these statements about consumer mediation cells under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. (i) The State Government establishes a cel…
- A State Consumer Protection Council in a state held one meeting in April and another in October of the same year, convened by the State's Mi…
- Following an investigation, the Central Consumer Protection Authority finds sufficient evidence that a firm sold a dangerous electrical devi…