CS Executive · Setting Up of Business, Industrial and Labour Laws · Evaluation of Labour Legislation and need of Labour Code
Vikram Auto Components Ltd, Chennai, uses contract labour in a core activity, and a union says this is itself an unfair labour practice under Section 84 of the Industrial Relations Code, 2020. Which analysis is best supported by the official text?
Contract labour in core activities is governed by Section 57 of the OSH Code, which prohibits it except under the stated provisos. Section 84 of the Industrial Relations Code only prohibits unfair labour practices specified in the Second Schedule, so the two operate separately.
- ASection 84 itself bars all contract labour, so the engagement is unlawful
- BContract labour in core activities is prohibited under Section 57 of the OSH Code, subject to its provisos, while Section 84 prohibits only practices specified in the Second ScheduleCorrect
- CSection 57 of the OSH Code permits contract labour in core activities in every case, so nothing is prohibited
- DSection 84 allows contract labour in core activities if the union is unregistered
Explanation
Section 57(1) of the OSH Code prohibits contract labour in core activities, with exceptions such as activities ordinarily done through a contractor or sudden increase in work. Section 84 of the IR Code separately prohibits only practices specified in the Second Schedule. The two provisions operate separately, so the union cannot rely on Section 84 alone to bar contract labour.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Evaluation of Labour Legislation and need of Labour Code shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Evaluation of Labour Legislation and need of Labour Code questions
- Sunrise Textiles Ltd., Surat, has a contract of service that gives its workers a more generous benefit on a matter than the Code on Social S…
- A State Government wants to appoint a competent authority for a chapter of the Code on Social Security, 2020. Which person fits the stated e…
- Prakash Textiles Ltd runs a mill in Surat. Earlier it had to comply with many separate Central labour laws, each with its own definitions, r…
- In the Finance Act, 2017, the Eighth Schedule item for the Industrial Tribunal constituted by the Central Government was amended by Section …
- Sunrise Textiles Pvt Ltd in Surat has a contract with its worker Meena that gives her benefits on a matter that are more favourable than wha…
- A principal employer, Bharat Logistics Ltd, Nagpur, faces a sudden increase in volume of work in a core activity that must be finished withi…