ACCA Applied Skills · Corporate and Business Law (Global) · Alternative dispute resolution mechanisms
Which feature most clearly distinguishes conciliation from arbitration?
A conciliator cannot impose a binding decision; the parties keep control and decide whether to settle. An arbitrator, by contrast, issues a binding award. Conciliators need not be judges, and the process is normally private rather than public.
- AThe conciliator cannot impose a binding decision on the partiesCorrect
- BThe conciliator must be a qualified judge
- CThe process is always conducted in public
Explanation
A conciliator helps the parties reach agreement and may suggest terms, but has no power to impose a binding outcome, unlike an arbitrator. Conciliators need not be judges, and ADR is typically private.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Alternative dispute resolution mechanisms shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Alternative dispute resolution mechanisms questions
- A supply contract between Altan Ltd and Bexley Inc contains a med-arb clause. Mediation failed, so the same person now acts as arbitrator. W…
- Epsilon Ltd and Zeta Ltd agreed to arbitrate any dispute. After the arbitrator issues an award, Epsilon Ltd, the losing party, argues the ar…
- Alpha Ltd won an arbitral award against Beta Inc, whose assets are in a different country. Both countries are parties to the New York Conven…
- Lumo Ltd and Verde Ltd have a long-term supply relationship and want to keep trading after a pricing dispute. They want a neutral person to …
- Kappa Ltd is considering negotiation, mediation and arbitration for a dispute. Which of the following is the method in which a neutral third…
- Arlen Co and Brisa Co mediated their dispute and signed a written settlement agreement. Arlen later refuses to perform it. Which statement i…