Skip to content

CMA Foundation · Fundamentals of Business Laws and Business Communication · Legislative Process in India

Which statement about a Joint Sitting of both Houses of Parliament for an ordinary Bill is correct?

A joint sitting is summoned by the President to resolve a deadlock between the two Houses over an ordinary Bill, for example where one House rejects it or does not pass it within six months. The Speaker of the Lok Sabha presides, and it does not apply to Money Bills or Constitution Amendment Bills.

  1. AIt may be summoned by the President when the Houses disagree on the Bill and the deadlock persists as provided in the ConstitutionCorrect
  2. BIt can be summoned by the Speaker alone whenever a Bill is delayed
  3. CIt is available for Money Bills and Constitution Amendment Bills as a matter of course
  4. DIt is presided over by the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha

Explanation

The President may summon a joint sitting to resolve a deadlock over an ordinary Bill, such as rejection by one House or a delay of over six months. The Speaker, not the Rajya Sabha Chairman, presides. Money Bills and Constitution Amendment Bills are not resolved this way, so the other options are incorrect.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Legislative Process in India shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Legislative Process in India questions