CMA Intermediate · Corporate Accounting and Auditing · Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets (Ind AS 37)
Which statement about the use of the term 'contingent' in Ind AS 37 is correct?
Within Ind AS 37, 'contingent' describes liabilities and assets that are not recognised because their existence will be confirmed only by uncertain future events not wholly within the entity's control. It also applies to liabilities that fail the recognition criteria.
- AIt is used for liabilities and assets not recognised because their existence will be confirmed only by uncertain future events not wholly within the entity's controlCorrect
- BIt is used for every provision because all provisions are uncertain
- CIt is used only for assets and never for liabilities
- DIt is used for liabilities that are certain in amount but uncertain in timing
Explanation
Paragraph 12 says that although all provisions are contingent in a general sense, within the Standard 'contingent' is used for items not recognised because their existence depends on uncertain events outside the entity's wholly controlled actions. It also covers liabilities not meeting recognition criteria.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets (Ind AS 37) shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets (Ind AS 37) questions
- Dhruv Mining Ltd must restore a site at the end of 3 years at an estimated cost of Rs 6,63,000. The pre-tax discount rate is 10% per annum (…
- Sharma Textiles Ltd faces a warranty claim on a large batch of goods sold. Past experience shows the single obligation will settle at Rs 8,0…
- Meera Pharma Ltd's liability arises from an item that is specifically dealt with by another Ind AS. Under the scope of Ind AS 37, what is th…
- Which combination correctly reflects the scope rules and Indian-specific features of Ind AS 37 compared with IAS 37?
- Rohini Textiles Ltd has a present obligation from a past event relating to a customer's claim. An outflow of resources is probable, but the …
- Himalaya Pharma Ltd is defending a lawsuit. Legal advisers say it is yet to be confirmed whether the company has a present obligation at all…