FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview
Which statement about using QQ plots to assess whether a return sample follows a hypothesised distribution is most accurate?
A QQ plot is a visual diagnostic. Linearity shows the sample and reference differ at most by location and scale, while curvature at the ends reveals tail differences. It gives no formal p-value and does not compare means across periods.
- AA QQ plot is a visual tool that can reveal tail differences and whether the distributions differ only in location and scaleCorrect
- BA QQ plot provides a formal p-value for rejecting the hypothesised distribution
- CA QQ plot is only meaningful when the sample has more than 10,000 observations
- DA QQ plot compares sample means across time periods
Explanation
QQ plots are graphical: linearity indicates the same distribution family up to location and scale, and departures at the ends reveal tail differences. They give no formal test statistic or p-value, work with modest samples (though noisier tails), and compare quantiles rather than means.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview questions
- A risk manager compares the 99% 1-day VaR from historical simulation using 1,000 days of data against a parametric normal VaR. Which stateme…
- Two independent bonds each have a 4% chance of a USD 100 million loss and a 96% chance of zero loss. A risk manager computes the 95% VaR of …
- A portfolio has a one-day 95% VaR of USD 1.5 million under a normal, zero-mean, i.i.d. assumption (z at 95% = 1.645). Using the square-root-…
- A bank's regulator proposes replacing 99% VaR with 97.5% expected shortfall for capital. A risk manager explains the main practical differen…
- A trader holds a position whose daily P/L is normally distributed with mean USD 0.5 million and standard deviation USD 4 million. Using z = …
- A risk manager estimates 99% VaR for a position as 2.50 million. Using the quantile standard error formula, the estimated standard error is …