ACCA Applied Knowledge · Management Accounting · Variance calculations and analysis
Zeta Ltd uses standard marginal costing. Budgeted sales were 2,000 units and actual sales were 2,150 units. The standard contribution is $12 per unit and the standard profit under absorption costing is $7 per unit. What is the sales volume variance in the marginal costing operating statement?
The sales volume variance is $1,800 favourable. Actual sales exceeded budget by 150 units, and under marginal costing the difference is valued at the standard contribution of $12 per unit, not at the absorption profit of $7 per unit.
- A$1,800 favourableCorrect
- B$1,050 favourable
- C$1,800 adverse
- D$25,800 favourable
Explanation
Under marginal costing the sales volume variance is valued at standard contribution per unit: (2,150 - 2,000) x $12 = $1,800 favourable. The $1,050 figure uses standard absorption profit, which is wrong for marginal costing. Sales exceeded budget, so the variance cannot be adverse.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Variance calculations and analysis shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Variance calculations and analysis questions
- Corvin Ltd's standard labour rate is $12 per hour. During June, 5,000 hours were paid for at a total cost of $62,000. What is the labour rat…
- Kestrel Ltd budgeted to sell 2,000 units at a standard selling price of $50 per unit. Actual sales were 2,000 units at $47 per unit. What is…
- A company prepares an operating statement from budgeted profit using absorption costing. Budgeted profit is $24,000. The variances are: sale…
- Dunmore Ltd has a standard labour rate of $15 per hour. In May, 2,000 hours were paid for at an actual cost of $31,000, and 100 hours were i…
- A company absorbs variable production overheads on the basis of direct labour hours. Which statement about the variable overhead efficiency …
- An operating statement shows a favourable material price variance, an adverse material usage variance and an adverse labour efficiency varia…