Corporate Accounting and Financial Management · Operational Approach to Financial Decision
Capital Structure Theories: NI, NOI, Traditional and MM Approaches
Updated 11 October 2026 · Fact-checked
Capital structure theories explain whether the mix of debt and equity changes the value of a firm and its overall cost of capital (Ko). The NI approach says more debt raises value. The NOI approach and MM without taxes say the mix is irrelevant. The Traditional approach says an optimum mix exists. MM with taxes favours debt.
Understand Capital Structure Theories
A firm raises long-term funds from debt and equity. Debt is cheaper because interest is paid before equity holders get anything and, under tax rules, interest is deductible. Equity is costlier because shareholders bear more risk. The question is simple: can you change the value of the firm by changing the debt-equity mix?
All theories use the same building blocks: Ke is cost of equity, Kd is cost of debt, Ko is overall cost of capital (WACC), V = S + D is the value of the firm, where S is market value of equity and D is market value of debt. Value moves opposite to Ko: when Ko falls, V rises.
The Net Income (NI) approach (Durand) assumes Kd and Ke stay constant as debt rises. Debt is cheaper than equity, so more debt pulls Ko down and V up. The firm is best at nearly 100% debt. S = (EBIT − I) ÷ Ke, and V = S + D.
The Net Operating Income (NOI) approach (Durand) assumes Ko and Kd are constant. Debt looks cheap, but it makes equity riskier, so Ke rises exactly enough to cancel the benefit. Ko never changes, so V = EBIT ÷ Ko and capital structure is irrelevant. S = V − D, and Ke is found from that.
The Traditional approach sits in between. Up to a point, adding debt lowers Ko because cheap debt outweighs a mild rise in Ke. Then Ko remains more or less constant over a range of debt levels. This range is the optimum capital structure, where Ko is lowest and V is highest. Beyond that range, Ke and Kd both rise sharply, so Ko climbs.
Modigliani-Miller (MM) gives a rigorous version of NOI. Without taxes, with perfect markets, V of a levered firm equals V of an unlevered firm, because investors can create their own leverage (arbitrage). Ko then equals the cost of equity of the all-equity firm, Ke(u), at every debt level. With corporate tax, interest saves tax, so V levered = V unlevered + tax shield, and debt adds value.
Key rules to remember
- Value of the firm
- V = S + D
- S = market value of equity, D = market value of debt.
- NI approach: value of equity
- S = (EBIT − I) ÷ Ke = Earnings available to equity ÷ Ke
- I = interest = Kd × D. Ke and Kd are constant.
- Overall cost of capital
- Ko = EBIT ÷ V
- Used in NI to find Ko once V is known; in NOI Ko is given.
- NOI approach: value of the firm
- V = EBIT ÷ Ko
- Then S = V − D and Ke = (EBIT − I) ÷ S.
- MM Proposition I (no taxes)
- Vu = Vl = EBIT ÷ Ko
- Value is independent of capital structure. Ko is the same at every debt level and equals the cost of equity of the all-equity firm, Ke(u).
- MM Proposition II (no taxes)
- Ke = Ko + (Ko − Kd) × (D ÷ S)
- Cost of equity rises linearly with debt-equity ratio.
- MM with corporate tax: value
- Vl = Vu + (t × D)
- t = tax rate; t × D is the present value of the interest tax shield (debt assumed permanent).
- MM with tax: cost of equity
- Ke = Ko(u) + (Ko(u) − Kd) × (1 − t) × (D ÷ S)
- Ko(u) is the cost of capital of the unlevered firm (its Ke).
How to solve Capital Structure Theories questions
Identify which theory the question names, then follow the same flow: earnings, value, then costs.
- 1Write down the given data: EBIT, interest rate, debt amount, Ke, Ko, tax rate.
- 2Identify the approach (NI, NOI, Traditional or MM) and note its key assumption: NI has constant Ke and Kd; NOI has constant Ko.
- 3Calculate interest I = Kd × D and earnings available to equity = EBIT − I (and less tax if tax is given).
- 4For NI: S = earnings ÷ Ke, then V = S + D. For NOI: V = EBIT ÷ Ko, then S = V − D.
- 5Find the missing cost: Ko = EBIT ÷ V under NI, or Ke = earnings to equity ÷ S under NOI.
- 6For MM, use Vl = Vu + tD with tax, or Vu = Vl without tax, and check by arbitrage if asked.
- 7Compare the options in a short table of S, D, V, Ke and Ko, and state which structure is best.
- 8Write a one-line conclusion tied to the theory, for example that V rises with debt under NI but stays unchanged under NOI.
Quickest way: Three-line shortcut for NI vs NOI numericals
When to use it: When the question asks you to compute V, Ke or Ko at different debt levels and time is short.
- NI: compute S = (EBIT − I) ÷ Ke, add D to get V, then Ko = EBIT ÷ V.
- NOI: compute V = EBIT ÷ Ko, subtract D to get S, then Ke = (EBIT − I) ÷ S.
- Sanity check: under NI, V must rise with debt and Ko must fall. Under NOI, V and Ko must stay the same.
Common mistakes in Capital Structure Theories
Mixing up what is constant in NI and NOI.
Both are Durand's approaches with similar names.
Fix: Remember: NI keeps Ke and Kd constant; NOI keeps Ko (and Kd) constant. Write this at the top of your answer.
Using EBIT instead of EBIT minus interest to value equity under NI.
Students apply the NOI formula everywhere.
Fix: Equity value always uses earnings after interest. EBIT is used only for the whole firm value V.
Forgetting to subtract D from V to get S under NOI.
Students stop once V is found.
Fix: Always do S = V − D before calculating Ke.
Saying MM without taxes says debt is useless because it is costly.
Confusing irrelevance with cost.
Fix: MM says cheaper debt is exactly offset by a higher Ke, so Ko and V stay unchanged. Explain the arbitrage logic.
Using t × D under MM with tax when debt is not stated as permanent, or applying it to equity.
The formula is memorised without its assumption.
Fix: State that debt is assumed perpetual, and multiply tax rate by debt only.
Describing the Traditional approach as Ko falling all the way with more debt, or staying flat throughout.
It is mixed up with NI (Ko keeps falling) or NOI (Ko never changes).
Fix: Say that Ko declines up to a point, remains more or less constant over a range of debt levels (the optimum, where Ko is lowest and V is highest), and then rises.
Worked examples
Example 1
A firm has EBIT of ₹5,00,000. It has ₹10,00,000 of 10% debentures. Ke is 15%. Using the Net Income approach, find the value of the firm and the overall cost of capital.
Show the solution
- Interest = 10% × ₹10,00,000 = ₹1,00,000.
- Earnings available to equity = ₹5,00,000 − ₹1,00,000 = ₹4,00,000.
- S = ₹4,00,000 ÷ 0.15 = ₹26,66,667 (approx.).
- V = S + D = ₹26,66,667 + ₹10,00,000 = ₹36,66,667.
- Ko = EBIT ÷ V = ₹5,00,000 ÷ ₹36,66,667 = 13.64% (approx.).
Answer: Value of the firm is about ₹36,66,667 and Ko is about 13.64%, lower than Ke of 15% because cheaper debt is used.
Example 2
Under the Net Operating Income approach, a firm has EBIT of ₹3,00,000, Ko of 12.5% and ₹8,00,000 of 10% debt. Find the value of the firm, value of equity and cost of equity.
Show the solution
- V = EBIT ÷ Ko = ₹3,00,000 ÷ 0.125 = ₹24,00,000.
- S = V − D = ₹24,00,000 − ₹8,00,000 = ₹16,00,000.
- Interest = 10% × ₹8,00,000 = ₹80,000.
- Earnings to equity = ₹3,00,000 − ₹80,000 = ₹2,20,000.
- Ke = ₹2,20,000 ÷ ₹16,00,000 = 13.75%.
Answer: Value of the firm is ₹24,00,000, value of equity is ₹16,00,000 and Ke is 13.75%. Because Ko is fixed, changing the debt level would not change V.
Exam tips
- Numericals on NI and NOI are common as a comparison: solve both for the same data and state the conclusion in one line.
- Theory questions often ask for differences. Use points: assumption, effect of debt on Ko, effect on V, optimum structure.
- For MM, list the assumptions: perfect capital markets, no transaction costs, same risk class, no taxes in the basic version, and arbitrage.
- Show formula, substitution and result in separate lines so marks are awarded even if arithmetic slips.
- Draw a small sketch of Ko against leverage for the Traditional approach if time allows; it supports your description.
Practice questions from Operational Approach to Financial Decision
- Vihaan Ltd has EBIT of ₹8,00,000 and interest of ₹2,00,000. What is its financial leverage (degree of financial leverage, DFL) at this level…
- Sunrise Traders Ltd. has sales of ₹10,00,000, variable costs of ₹6,00,000 and fixed operating costs of ₹2,00,000. What is its degree of oper…
- Which assumption is characteristic of the traditional approach to capital structure but NOT of the Net Operating Income approach?
- Asha Textiles has EBIT of ₹6,00,000 and its capital includes 10% debentures of ₹10,00,000. Its tax rate is 25%. Using the trading-on-equity …
- Kaveri Industries has EBIT of ₹5,00,000 and interest on debt of ₹2,00,000. There is no preference capital. What is its degree of financial l…
Capital Structure Theories in other exams
The same ground in other exams, if you are preparing for more than one or want another angle on it.
Capital Structure Theories: frequently asked questions
What is the difference between the NI approach and the NOI approach?
NI assumes Ke and Kd are constant, so more debt lowers Ko and raises firm value. NOI assumes Ko is constant because Ke rises to offset cheaper debt, so value does not change with capital structure.
What does the Traditional approach say?
It says Ko first falls as debt is added, reaches a minimum at an optimum structure, and then rises as financial risk grows. So there is a best debt-equity mix that maximises firm value.
How is MM theory with taxes different from MM without taxes?
Without taxes, firm value is independent of capital structure. With corporate tax, interest is deductible, so a levered firm is worth more than an unlevered one by the tax shield, t × D.
Is MM without taxes the same as NOI?
They reach the same conclusion that capital structure is irrelevant. MM adds a proof through arbitrage, where investors switch between levered and unlevered firms until values are equal.