FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview
An analyst compares the quantiles of a sample of loss data with those of a reference distribution in a QQ plot. The plotted points form an almost perfectly straight line with a slope of 2.0 and an intercept of 0.5 (sample quantile on the vertical axis). Which conclusion is most appropriate?
The sample is consistent with the reference distribution family up to a location and scale change. A straight QQ line means the shapes match; the slope of 2.0 shows scale about twice as large and the intercept of 0.5 shows a location shift.
- AThe sample is not from the reference family because the line does not have a slope of one
- BThe sample is consistent with the reference family up to a location and scale change, with a scale about twice and a location shift of about 0.5Correct
- CThe sample has tails twice as heavy as the reference distribution
- DThe sample has a mean of 2.0 and a standard deviation of 0.5 relative to the reference
Explanation
A linear QQ plot implies the sample is drawn from the same family as the reference, differing only by a linear transformation: sample = 0.5 + 2.0 × reference. Slope reflects relative scale and intercept reflects location. A slope different from one does not indicate a different shape. Heavy tails would appear as curvature, not a straight line.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview questions
- An analyst estimates a VaR quantile from a sample. Holding the sample size and the distribution fixed, how does the standard error of the es…
- Which is the main advantage of using a QQ plot rather than a histogram overlaid with a fitted density to assess whether returns follow a giv…
- A bank's risk report shows a point estimate of expected shortfall (ES) from historical simulation but no measure of its precision. A reviewe…
- A risk manager notes that a 1-year historical simulation window used for VaR contains only a calm market period, and the VaR estimate is ver…
- A portfolio has a one-day 99% VaR of USD 2.0 million, estimated under normality with zero mean. A risk manager wants the 10-day 99% VaR usin…
- A desk's estimated one-day 99% VaR is 3.00% of portfolio value, with an estimated standard error of 0.20%. Assuming the estimator is approxi…