ACCA Applied Knowledge · Management Accounting · Variance calculations and analysis
Dalton Co makes product P, with a standard of 3 labour hours per unit at $10 per hour. In March it produced 1,200 units using 3,750 hours. What is the labour efficiency variance?
The labour efficiency variance is $1,500 adverse. Producing 1,200 units should take 3,600 hours, but 3,750 were used, so 150 extra hours were worked. Valued at the standard rate of $10 per hour, this gives an adverse variance of $1,500.
- A$1,500 adverseCorrect
- B$1,500 favourable
- C$150 adverse
- D$3,750 adverse
Explanation
Standard hours for 1,200 units = 1,200 x 3 = 3,600. Actual hours were 3,750, so 150 hours excess x $10 = $1,500 adverse. Option favourable has the wrong sign; $150 omits the rate.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Variance calculations and analysis shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Variance calculations and analysis questions
- Brenner Co's standard is 5 kg of material at $12 per kg per unit. Actual output was 3,000 units. Actual material used was 15,400 kg at an ac…
- Dunmore Ltd budgeted 10,000 units and 20,000 labour hours, with fixed overheads of $80,000. Actual output was 10,500 units, taking 20,800 ho…
- Marlow Ltd budgeted to produce 4,000 units in the period, with budgeted fixed overheads of $60,000. Actual production was 4,300 units. Actua…
- A company's sales price variance for a period is adverse and its sales volume variance is favourable. Which of the following is the most lik…
- Dalton Ltd uses absorption costing. Budgeted sales were 3,000 units at a standard price of $30, with a standard full cost of $22 per unit. A…
- Which of the following is the most likely cause of an adverse labour rate variance combined with a favourable labour efficiency variance?