CS Professional · Corporate Restructuring, Valuation and Insolvency · Regulatory Approvals of Scheme
Section 264 of the Companies Act, 2013 dealt with implementation of a scheme of revival and rehabilitation of sick companies. A student cites it for a present-day scheme. What is the correct position per the India Code text?
Section 264 is omitted with effect from 15 November 2016, by section 255 and the Eleventh Schedule of the Act. It cannot be relied on for a present scheme. Supervision of implementation of a sanctioned compromise or arrangement is now governed by section 231.
- AIt is omitted with effect from 15 November 2016Correct
- BIt is in force and applies to all sanctioned schemes
- CIt was substituted by section 235 on that date
- DIt applies only to companies with paid-up capital above Rs 100 crore
Explanation
The India Code text shows section 264 as omitted by section 255 and the Eleventh Schedule, w.e.f. 15-11-2016. Sections 261 to 263 are likewise omitted. Implementation supervision of a sanctioned compromise or arrangement now rests on section 231.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Regulatory Approvals of Scheme shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Regulatory Approvals of Scheme questions
- Mehta Textiles Ltd's advisor drafts a note stating that a scheme of revival and rehabilitation of a sick company will be sanctioned by the T…
- A student preparing a note on the Companies Act, 2013 claims that a Rehabilitation and Insolvency Fund under Section 269 can finance the rev…
- Gangotri Steels Ltd's board proposes to approach the Tribunal for sanction of a revival scheme and wants the sanctioned scheme to bind all c…
- Godavari Steels Ltd's sanctioned arrangement is only partly workable, but the company can still pay its debts as per the scheme. Can the Tri…
- After the Tribunal sanctioned the arrangement of Narmada Agro Ltd, it appointed no one to monitor progress. Which statement about the Tribun…
- Bharat Polymers Ltd's arrangement was sanctioned, but the Tribunal is satisfied that it cannot be implemented satisfactorily even with modif…