CS Professional · Corporate Restructuring, Valuation and Insolvency · Regulatory Approvals of Scheme
Sharma Steels Ltd's secretary says that once the Tribunal sanctions a scheme, it becomes binding on all members and creditors under Section 263 of the Act. Checking the official text of the Act, which statement is correct?
Section 263, headed Scheme to be binding, has been omitted from the Companies Act, 2013 with effect from 15 November 2016. The secretary cannot cite it as a live provision. It was neither substituted nor limited to liquidation schemes.
- ASection 263 (Scheme to be binding) is in force and the statement is correct as per that section
- BSection 263 was omitted w.e.f. 15-11-2016, so the statement cannot be supported by that section of the ActCorrect
- CSection 263 was substituted in 2016 with a new sub-section on binding effect
- DSection 263 applies only to schemes of liquidation
Explanation
The official text records Section 263 (Scheme to be binding) as omitted by s. 255 and the Eleventh Schedule w.e.f. 15-11-2016. It was not substituted or restricted. So the reference to it as a live provision is incorrect.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Regulatory Approvals of Scheme shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Regulatory Approvals of Scheme questions
- Ganga Holdings Ltd validly gave notice under section 235 to a dissenting shareholder, Mr Rao, of Yamuna Ltd. Mr Rao did not apply to the Tri…
- A draft board note for Kaveri Textiles Ltd states that an arrangement with its creditors binds the company and the creditors under Section 3…
- Under a share-transfer scheme, Ashoka Holdings Ltd (transferee) has obtained the required approval from the shareholders of Bharat Dyes Ltd.…
- Sagar Textiles Ltd's management proposes a scheme of revival and rehabilitation and says it will seek Tribunal sanction under Section 262 of…
- In the winding up by the Tribunal of Kaveri Agro Ltd, a contributory objects to a compromise the Company Liquidator proposes under Section 3…
- Kaveri Engineering Ltd's counsel argues that although Section 261 is omitted, a draft revival scheme sanctioned by the Tribunal under Sectio…